The Chinon Parchment

BY: Mark

Central to Barbara Frale’s recent book, The Templars: The Secret History Revealed (which, I have to admit, I have not read yet), is the discovery of the Chinon Parchment, which contains a transcript of the last interrogation of Templar leaders by Church interrogators.

By the 14th century, the Templars had were no longer a “blunt instrument” used by the Church to drive Muslims out of the Holy Land, they had become an institution unto themselves, both militarily and financially. It was the financial bit that got under the King of France’s nose. As Philip IV had the current Pope, Clement V, under his thumb, an order was sent out to imprison the Templars and seize all their assets. On Friday, October 13, 1307, the Templar Grandmaster Jacques de Molay and nearly every other Templar in France was arrested. Clement V waited until November to issue Pastoralis Praeeminentiae, the papal bull that instructed every Christian monarch in Europe to follow Philip’s lead and to sweep up the Templars.

The Templars were then subjected to all the fun bits of the Inquisition, most confessed, and then later recanted, which set up an awkward situation of them all being considered as lapsed heretics (forced confessions notwithstanding). Philip, not finding all the cash and trinkets that he had been led to believe that the Templars held, continued to press Clement V, and in 1312, the Pope issued Vox in excelso, abolishing the Order. Con norma irreformabile e perpetual, the 14th century version of “with extreme prejudice.” DeMolay and a few other leaders were burned at the stake on March 18, 1314.

The legends started almost immediately. De Molay was said to have cursed both King Philip and Pope Clement V as he was being burned, saying that they would meet him before God by the end of the year. Both men may have laughed it off at the time, but Clement V died a month later and Philip had an “accident” while hunting during the fall.

“Accident.” I’m just perpetuating the mythology, aren’t I?

Anyway, a few years ago (our time, now), Barbara Frale, a Vatican historian, stumbled across the Chinon Parchment in the bowels of the Secret Archives of the Vatican (read the room in back where all the uncatalogued paperwork has been stacked for the last eight hundred years). It contains a transcript of the visit several Cardinals made to the castle of Chinon where a number of Templar leaders were being held. In 1308. If you read the transcript, you’ll notice that, in addition to confessing, the Templar leadership were all absolved of the crimes they were accused of.

Now, if you’re absolved of your crimes, then doesn’t it seem somewhat unfair that you’re later hauled out of bed and burned at the stake for those same crimes?

The remnants of the Templar Order certainly thought so. Shortly after the publication of Frale’s book, they sued the Vatican.

The bit in the Chinon Parchment that really piqued the conspiracy theorist in me was that of all the Templars at Chinon only Hugo de Pérraud admitted to seeing the ‘head of an idol’ (one of the purported Templar treasures) while in Montpellier, in the possession of Brother Peter Alemandin, Preceptor of Montpellier. The others were not asked this question, nor did they admit to it. Why was Hugo singled out for this question, and why was it not asked of the others?